Saturday, October 19, 2013

Technology in the Classroom

The use of technology in the classroom is rapidly increasing  because of how fast it is changing society. Thus we (future teachers) are now responsible to teach technology literacy. Our students will not be able to compete in the professional world if they do not know how to use technology. Thus, it is our job to incorporate technology into the classroom when it will enrich our lesson, engage our students, and improve their literacy in the technological world.The hardest part is figuring out when to integrate technology into our classrooms. I believe that technology should be incorporated into certain parts of the curriculum as enrichment assignments. I do not believe it should completely replace other forms of instruction that use books and paper. My reasoning behind this is the theory of differentiated instruction. We know that not every student has the same learning style or is at the same academic level as their classmates. Therefore technology is another outlet to provide this differentiated instruction for those students who would prefer to use it. In the classroom I’m in now for example, if the students want to know what is going on, what’s due, what they will be learning that week, the teacher uses a Google calendar to  post homework assignments and update reminders for upcoming tests. This allows the students to go online and check the calendar to help them stay organized. She also has a written calendar in the classroom on the whiteboard for students who prefer to refer to that calendar.
Technology can also be used as a background semester long project like Pixton comics. Pixton is a very reasonable online website for educators that allows students to design their comics. This would fall under the genre of a graphic narrative where the students have to work on their creativity, writing, reading, listening and speaking skills. This type of project has to be thought out by the teacher as to when they could implement it into their class, but it is a great tool to get your class working on something that makes them have to write their own storyline, create characters, and also record their voices as they read through their comic. We saw an example of this project by Professor David Shultz, the technology coordinator at the language resource center at Grand Valley State University. I would use this  comic book idea for a  semester long project which allows the students enough time to devote quality to work, but it also gives them an assignment to continuously work on so that when you have free time in class, they can always work on their comic.
As to my future classroom, depending on the level of technological support I have in my future classroom, I would use technology with my weebly account for my class. Upload helpful videos of grammatical structures or cartoons that use the vocabulary we are studying. I would also like to create a semester long project for them to do like the Pixton comics. The good thing is that in order to differentiate your instruction, you could give the option of actually drawing and making a real comic book themselves as well, if they did not want to do it online. There are many options where we can utilize technology in the classroom, but we need to take precautions as to when we implement it into our curriculum and how we will be assessing them on an activity where technology is used. We need to prepare a strong rationale for why we are using technology in that specific task, how we will assess, and what our objectives are. Technology is made to help the process of learning be more fun and more interactive!

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Journal Article: Creating a Low-anxiety classroom environment

After being a foreign language learner and now a teacher assistant in a Spanish classroom, I have experienced and observed certain levels of anxiety when asked to speak in the target language. For me, my anxiety came when I would speak Spanish with other native English speakers because I knew that we were speaking for correctness and proficiency and not for survival. My preference is to speak with native Spanish speaker who knows no English at all, thus allowing me to make errors with no shame or hesitation so that I can try my best to get my point across. This anxiety is different for every student. The anxiety for some might come from confidence issues with social conversations in general, they are not given back encouragement for their efforts after spoken, or the environment of the classroom is a a high anxiety classroom where errors are publicized and effort are not recognized.
Research on foreign and second language anxiety is hard to address because the relationship between anxiety and language learning/performance could not be viewed without taking into account an assortment of variables, such as language setting, anxiety definitions, anxiety measures, age of subject, etc. Dolly Young suggests in her journal Creating a low-Anxiety Classroom Environment: What does language anxiety research suggest?, that language anxiety arises from: 1) personal and interpersonal anxieties; 2)learner beliefs about language learning; 3) instructor beliefs about language learning; 4) Instructor-leaner interactions; 5) classroom procedures; and 6) language testing.So from these six probable causes of language anxiety, how do we as teachers create a low-anxiety classroom to have an effective learning environment?
Well Young suggests that the modeling approach to error correction, students are not spotlighted in front of their peers and corrected, but correct feedback is given to those language learners who need it (Young, 8). This relates to our classroom discourse article as it talks about modeling feedback. Lyster and Ranta (1997) found the following types of corrective feedback were used by teachers in their interactions with the students: recasts, explicit correction, repetition, metalinguistic feedback,  and clarification requests. By providing corrective feedback in your classroom, you can help the student's language anxiety of Instructor-learner interactions which is one of the listed causes of anxiety in the classroom.
Another aspect of language anxiety are personal and interpersonal anxieties. Research was done in a classroom in Turkey to seek an answer to the question as to whether Computer-Mediated Communication Technologies be a solution for overcoming problems of sufficient time for practice to enable students to achieve fluency in speaking though internalizing the structures, and establishing a balance between fluency and accuracy. Research found that computer-mediated communication (CMC) emerges as a feasible solution particularly for improvement of speaking skills and decreasing the level of foreign language anxiety by raising self-confidence of the students within the scope of both formal and distance education (TOJDE,2). For example, these numbers were obtained by an analysis of the data from the text chat logs automatically kept via flash player, the findings show that with the task based information gap activity via chat room, where 96.7% of the words used by the students during activity were in the target language. Their comments as to why they enjoyed these activities the most important reason was because they were related to their own lives ans that they used them frequently. One student says, " it was enjoyable to explain something that belongs to me." We see, that integrating technology and really trying to create a low-anxiety classroom is really important. The modeling approach and CMC can be used to differentiate your instruction to allow students to achieve fluency in the target language. My response to my research about classroom anxiety is that as teachers, we need to be attentive to the needs of our students, how we interact with them and how we create procedures to combat language anxieties. If you want to read more, the two articles are attached below.



by Ozdener, Nesrin and Satar, H. Muge
04/2008, Volume 9, Issue 2, p. 16



Creating a Low-Anxiety Classroom Environment: What Does Language Anxiety Research Suggest?
Dolly Jesusita Young
The Modern Language Journal
Vol. 75, No. 4 (Winter, 1991), pp. 426-439
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the National Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/329492